6 Ways to Make Your Film Ineffective

© Ilyes Laszlo - Fotolia.comEvery month young filmmakers who want to learn a golden nugget of information approach me. They ask for secrets of the trade that they can use to boost their filmmaking skills to the next level. But, most of the time they are not ready for a higher level of skill and need to focus instead on what not to do – those things that stop them from being successful.

I’ve decided to share a list of items that make their films ineffective. The six items are common among many young filmmakers and I hope that this list will bring new insights to bear.

1. Kill Your Dreams
It’s far easier to pull a cast and crew together and make a movie when filmmakers compromise their work. In doing so, they quickly build a team of eager friends, but soon find that compromises weaken their original concept. The short film becomes an image piece instead of a story – Something that excites others, but rarely gets a second viewing.

Having judged in many film festivals, I’ve learned that teams with selected cast and crew based on each individual’s skills made the awarded films. Compromise was limited to ideas that strengthened the story, rather than appeased people to ensure their involvement.

2. Focus on Yourself
First-time filmmakers always talk about a great idea and how he plans to make an award-winning film. The conversation is all about the filmmaker placing his mark on society, but the end result is typically a movie that doesn’t make sense to the audience because it’s void of a beginning, middle or end.

Maintaining an audience perspective allows directors to work and test the imagery of his story with those outside of his inner circle. This unbiased feedback forces more creativity and demands a visualization of the story that can be received by people who know nothing about the synopsis or the director’s original vision. To survive, the story is forced into having a beginning, middle and end.

3. Try to Keep Everyone Happy
When a filmmaker needs to please his great aunt who funded the short film, or his mother who wants to make sure his short film is respectable, or his friends demand the film is cool, the filmmaker loses his passion and creates such a watered-down story that nobody cares to watch it.

Creating a story with universal appeal that holds true to the director’s heart becomes a powerful tool of passion that captivates even the greatest skeptic. Since film is an emotional medium it is critical that the director’s passion shows up in the story. This can only happen if it is his story and not one dictated by a board of investors.

4. Make Mediocrity Your Standard
Producing the exact same kind of story over and over again brings blandness to the theater experience that is sure to reduce the audience. Never expanding the budget to include higher-quality elements within a show, or experimenting with how the story is expressed, will lead to a show that is unworthy of a second viewing.

Experimentation is at the forefront of bringing a unique story to an audience in a new and refreshing way. While audiences like something that feels familiar, they also demand something new that they’ve never seen before. Every story requires a set piece that drives the story out of mediocrity and into the spotlight.

5. Treat Every Film The Same
Filmmakers that think genre requires repetitiveness of story will likely kill second viewings and possibly future viewings. Only those living in denial will continue to put up with a director that produces the same ole thing with every release.

Audiences love to work for their entertainment. They like their thinking to be provoked, without any part of the story being handed to them on a silver platter. People want to be able to figure out what’s happening in the story just before its revealed, not during the opening act. Responding to this audience need requires a director who is willing to differentiate his titles from his previous work and his competitors.

6. Make It Obvious Who You Don’t Like
Films that preach to the proverbial choir and avoid relating to the general public will quickly deflate the film’s potential reach and life span. Making the film for such a tight niche that even like-minded people with a different vantage point can’t relate to will surely shorten the film’s release window.

Universal stories reach millions of people with a film’s specific message. The more open the film is in relating to various people or interest groups, the more powerful the message shared.

Film is a social media that is driven by emotional appeals. Any use of the medium in other capacities weakens the message and the film’s power to trigger change within its audience. By working around the above mistakes, a filmmaker can influence his ideal audience along with millions more.

Knowledge Vs. Wisdom in Screenwriting

© Pixelbliss - Fotolia.comThe audience is always amazed when a character displays wisdom, rather than just knowledge. In fact, when the main character just spews out knowledge, they become two dimensional and preachy – As seen in numerous faith-based films.

The key is to have the main character demonstrate, not preach the wisdom needed in life. This demonstration draws the audience into the story and inspires them to implement the character’s principles within their own life. To accomplish this ideal, the writer needs to understand the difference between knowledge and wisdom.

British broadcast journalist Miles Kington simply explained it when he said, “There is a difference between knowledge and wisdom. Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, not a vegetable. Wisdom is knowing not to include it in a fruit salad.”

This topic was also discussed for decades using the perspective of book sense versus street sense. Everyone understands that learning about something and experiencing it first hand is very different. The thinking process alone and the conclusions drawn by those gaining knowledge or wisdom from a particular situation will generate significantly different outcomes depending upon his or her vantage point.

The same holds true for characters on the screen. This results in the audience buying into an argument from the character demonstrating gained wisdom versus discarding the information from a character who preaches the shared truth.

To demonstrate a character’s wisdom takes a substantial amount of time in crafting visual depictions on the screen that reveal the wisdom, while preaching characters can be written within minutes. Also, to demonstrate wisdom, it requires a director who can draw a performance out of an actor, rather than one who commands a specific performance.

Over the past few months I’ve consulted with a professional screenwriter in the Asia Pacific region for a major motion picture that will be first released in the east and then followed in the west. Since one of the media companies involved is a media ministry, the screenwriter chose to write several preaching scenes in act three.

While the knowledge expounded in the third act was accurate based on the media ministry’s beliefs, it killed the story. Thankfully, the decision-makers have agreed to a rewrite, which was a wonderful surprise – Yet, expected.

You see, the entire movie was about the main character gaining wisdom. In act one, she clearly lacks knowledge and by act two is manipulated into a poor lifestyle thanks to a dangling carrot of knowledge. But, the tables soon turn and she realizes the difference between wisdom and knowledge. By choice, she seeks wisdom and witnesses it’s impact on life, causing her to desire it all the more. But, instead of act three helping the audience to see the benefits of this newly acquired wisdom, she becomes a preacher that tells everyone knowledge.

Demonstrating wisdom causes the audience to desire a drink from the same cup that brought wisdom to bear in the first place. Knowledge is rarely accepted as a solution in any character’s life and most audiences discard it as not being proven or worth testing in his or her own life.

The key to inspiring an audience to greatness starts with a great character driven screenplay that demonstrates the wisdom gained, not the expounding of easily discarded knowledge. I find it ironic that faith-based screenwriters, who want to inspire their audience through the passing on of wisdom, choose to leave wisdom out of the stories and instead gives voice to the preaching of knowledge. Then again, it takes a significant commitment and some twenty revisions to write wisdom into screenplays and most faith-based screenwriters believe in going with one of his or her first three “God-inspired” drafts, for fear of losing the original message planted within his or her heart.

However, there is a difference between cultivating a planted message and killing it. The better the craftsman, the greater chance the message will rise to a place of understanding through demonstration to its audience. Therefore, faith-based screenwriters must learn to embrace rewrites, knowing that they will eventually get his or her writing up to the level that God actually intended. For without the demonstration, there is no reception of the message. And, even Jesus shared parables that demonstrated wisdom, rather than expounded knowledge.

Copyright © 2015 by CJ Powers

87th Academy Award Nominations

Academy AwardsThe Oscar® nominations were released for the 87th Academy Awards that will air February 22nd. I have added links to the legally available screenplays that I could find.

Best Picture
“American Sniper”
“Birdman”
“Boyhood”
“The Grand Budapest Hotel”
“The Imitation Game”
“Selma”
“The Theory of Everything”
“Whiplash”

Best Actor
Steve Carell, “Foxcatcher”
Bradley Cooper, “American Sniper”
Benedict Cumberbatch, “The Imitation Game”
Michael Keaton, “Birdman”
Eddie Redmayne, “The Theory of Everything”

Best Actress
Marion Cotillard, “Two Days, One Night”
Felicity Jones, “The Theory of Everything”
Julianne Moore, “Still Alice”
Rosamund Pike, “Gone Girl”
Reese Witherspoon, “Wild”

Best Supporting Actor
Robert Duvall, “The Judge”
Ethan Hawke, “Boyhood”
Edward Norton, “Birdman”
Mark Ruffalo, “Foxcatcher”
J.K. Simmons, “Whiplash”

Best Supporting Actress
Patricia Arquette, “Boyhood”
Laura Dern, “Wild”
Keira Knightley, “The Imitation Game”
Emma Stone, “Birdman”
Meryl Streep, “Into the Woods”

Best Director
Alejandro González Iñárritu, “Birdman”
Richard Linklater, “Boyhood”
Bennett Miller, “Foxcatcher”
Wes Anderson, “The Grand Budapest Hotel”
Morten Tyldum, “The Imitation Game”

Best Animated Feature Film
“Big Hero 6″
“The Boxtrolls”
“How to Train Your Dragon 2″
“Song of the Sea”
“The Tale of the Princess Kaguya”

Best Adapted Screenplay
“American Sniper,” by Jason Hall
“The Imitation Game,” by Graham Moore
“Inherent Vice,” by Paul Thomas Anderson
“The Theory of Everything,” by Anthony McCarten
“Whiplash,” by Damien Chazelle

Best Original Screenplay
“Birdman,” by Alejandro G. Iñárritu, Nicolás Giacobone, Alexander Dinelaris Jr. & Armando Bo
“Boyhood,” by Richard Linklater
“Foxcatcher,” by E. Max Frye and Dan Futterman
“The Grand Budapest Hotel,” by Wes Anderson & Hugo Guinness
“Nightcrawler,” by Dan Gilroy

Best Cinematography
“Birdman,” Emmanuel Lubezki
“The Grand Budapest Hotel,” Robert Yeoman
“Ida,” Lukasz Zal and Ryszard Lenczewski
“Mr. Turner,” Dick Pope
“Unbroken,” Roger Deakins

Best Visual Effects
“Captain America: The Winter Soldier”
“Dawn of the Planet of the Apes”
“Guardians of the Galaxy”
“Interstellar”
“X-Men: Days of Future Past”

Best Documentary Feature
“Citizenfour”
“Finding Vivian Maier”
“Last Days in Vietnam”
“The Salt of the Earth”
“Virunga”

Best Documentary Short Subject
“Crisis Hotline: Veterans Press 1″
“Joanna”
“Our Curse”
“The Reaper (La Parka)”
“White Earth”

Best Film Editing
“American Sniper,” Joel Cox and Gary D. Roach
“Boyhood,” Sandra Adair
“The Grand Budapest Hotel,” Barney Pilling
“The Imitation Game,” William Goldenberg
“Whiplash,” Tom Cross

Best Original Song
“Everything Is Awesome,” from “The Lego Movie,” by Shawn Patterson
“Glory,” from “Selma, by John Stephens and Lonnie Lynn”
“Grateful,” from “Beyond the Lights,” by Diane Warren
“I’m Not Gonna Miss You,” from “Glen Campbell: I’ll Be Me,” by Glen Campbell and Julian Raymond
“Lost Stars,” from “Begin Again,” by Gregg Alexander and Danielle Brisebois

Best Production Design
“The Grand Budapest Hotel,” Adam Stockhausen and Anna Pinnock
“The Imitation Game,” Maria Djurkovic and Tatiana Macdonald
“Interstellar,” Nathan Crowley and Gary Fettis
“Into the Woods,” Dennis Gassner and Anna Pinnock
“Mr. Turner,” Suzie Davies and Charlotte Watts

Best Live Action Short Film
“Aya”
“Boogaloo and Graham”
“Butter Lamp (La Lampe au Beurre de Yak)”
“Parvaneh”
“The Phone Call”

Best Animated Short Film
“The Bigger Picture”
“The Dam Keeper”
“Feast”
“Me and my Moulton”
“A Single Life”

Best Sound Editing
“American Sniper,” Alan Robert Murray and Bub Asman
“Birdman,” Martin Hernández and Aaron Glascock
“The Hobbit: Battle of the Five Armies,” Brent Burge and Jason Canovas
“Interstellar,” Richard King
“Unbroken,” Becky Sullivan and Andrew DeCristofaro

Best Sound Mixing
“American Sniper,” John Reitz, Gregg Rudloff and Walt Martin
“Birdman,” Jon Taylor, Frank A. Montaño and Thomas Varga
“Interstellar,” Gary A. Rizzo, Gregg Landaker and Mark Weingarten
“Unbroken,” Jon Taylor, Frank A. Montaño and David Lee
“Whiplash,” Craig Mann, Ben Wilkins and Thomas Curley

Best Costume Design
“The Grand Budapest Hotel,” Milena Canonero
“Inherent Vice,” Mark Bridges
“Into the Woods,” Colleen Atwood
“Maleficent,” Anna B. Sheppard and Jane Clive
“Mr. Turner,” Jacqueline Durran

Best Foreign Language Film
“Ida” (Poland)
“Leviathan” (Russia)
“Tangerines” (Estonia)
“Timbuktu” (Mauritania)
“Wild Tales” (Argentina)

Best Makeup and Hairstyling
“Foxcatcher,” Bill Corso and Dennis Liddiard
“The Grand Budapest Hotel,” Frances Hannon and Mark Coulier
“Guardians of the Galaxy,” Elizabeth Yianni-Georgiou and David White

Best Original Score
“The Grand Budapest Hotel,” Alexandre Desplat
“The Imitation Game,” Alexandre Desplat
“Interstellar,” Hans Zimmer
“Mr. Turner,” Gary Yershon
“The Theory of Everything,” Jóhann Jóhannsson