Write, Read and Watch—Lessons from Marvel’s Jim Krueger

Jim_CJ_Art

I got together with a couple dozen creatives over the weekend for a workshop on story. It was a great time of networking with like-minded artists. Jim Krueger, a storyteller, comic book writer, novelist and filmmaker, was the keynote speaker. He’s most known for his works (including Earth X) at Marvel. He also won the prestigious Eisner Award for Justice (DC Comics).

Jim pointed out the three things that all writers need to do each day: write, read, and watch.

WRITE

Writers need to write everyday to strengthen and mature their “voice.” Jim, who tries to write four hours every day, believes that the writing process helps us to pour out the very thing that can fix our broken world. He also suggested that we have to know ourselves in order to find those internal nuggets of value that are worthy to be shared.

He gave us an exercise to write down our top 10 films that we love followed by the top 10 films we hate. The correlation was amazing and helped us to discover the passion that stirs within us. Within the stories we hated was an internal “No” wanting to be expressed. This pensive drive reveals the “Yes” that we want everyone to embrace—the very thing we must write about to be fulfilled.

READ

Screenwriters need to read the best scripts in the genre in which they write. Authors need to read the best books in the genre they write. Studying the best allows us to improve our techniques, while also learning what has already been done. Unique character reveals, rhythms, and pacing become second nature when we immerse ourselves in the writings of the best.

Being able to spot in others’ works what makes us feel good, and why, helps us understand how to craft our own stories that inspire. This is an important base element in writing that will attract followers and build a fan base. It’s the fulfillment of a natural need, according to Jim, who said, “People need to feel good about themselves after watching your story.”

WATCH

Since our world was transformed from a literary to a visual culture, Jim recommended that writers watch feature films and long form television to study what’s being created for the market and what is well received. While he didn’t intend to do a commercial for Movie Pass (now $6.95 for a monthly subscription program), he did recommend going to the movies often for study purposes.

James Patterson, who writes first thing every morning, shared in a class that I took a couple years ago, how he heads to a theater and watches a feature film after his morning writing session. Since he goes daily, he doesn’t always stay for the entire picture, but learns what he can about the market, what’s been done in the realm of stories, and any story techniques that he can observe and capture.

After convincing us that we all needed to be writing, reading and watching, Jim shared that the rules of story must also be followed with no exception. “Rules as a storyteller are never to be broken, only worked around with loopholes,” he said. When rules are broken, the audience can’t easily follow the story and loses interest, so it’s important to make sure the core elements or the logic and reasons behind the rules are never altered.

Jim pointed out that the limitations put on the storyteller are actually valuable creative tools. “Limitations allow us to put surprise and wonder into place,” he said. Understanding how wonder plays a role in the development of entertainment gives us the fuel to explore an idea until it rises to its best version before releasing it to the audience. Jim suggested that it could take anywhere from 4-6 weeks for an idea to mature to its highest value.

At the end of the day, Jim autographed three panel original art from his next published work due out in a few months. Keep your eyes out for his work.

Copyright © 2018 by CJ Powers

Confident Creations

© Peter Kim - Fotolia.comI recently coached a young filmmaker who wrote a short story that demonstrated a significant amount of confidence in his work. The artistic choices were bold and he didn’t allow any inexperience to slow his approach. The script was resolute in his desire to thrill the audience. The boldness of the character alone was enough to capture the audience’s attention as he struggled to discover what had happened to him.

This confidence in one’s art comes from practice and exploration. There is no other teacher that can raise the tone necessary for the proper development of a story. An internal boldness must surface in order to birth a vision of magnitude.

“The more you practice, learn, and make discoveries, the more confident you will be!” —Tim Delaney, Concept Development

Confidence is not the sole key to successfully developing a story. All creations need to take on a life of its own and transform throughout, as the plot points are ticked off, heading diligently toward the climax.

However, the backbone of any good story rises from the creator’s viewpoint and must stay intact, yet flexible. In this case, the filmmaker chose to shoot a short film in order to entice investors or distributors to bring a feature version of his story to the silver screen. He purposely left out the ending of the short story to enhance the audience’s desire to see the feature to find out how things end.

While raising a central, unanswered question certainly seeds a desire for more, it doesn’t prove that the filmmaker knows how to tell a complete story. If I were investing, I’d watch his short film and realize that he has a beginning, middle, and no ending. I’d feel ripped off and wonder if the feature will also leave the audience hanging or unsatisfied.

His choice isn’t uncommon. There is a trend in filmmakers leaving short films open ended. While it’s unsettling to the audience, it shifts the focus from the director’s ability to tell a story to his ability to make something look and feel cool. Many young filmmakers are more interested in the look and feel of a project than in giving the audience a resolving end to the story.

Unfortunately, films with only a beginning and middle do poorly at the box office. Even short films with solid endings outperform “impact films” 10 to 1. One reason is that a person won’t tell others about a film that doesn’t resolve. Very few will watch the film a second time because the impact is only good at the first viewing. All subsequent viewings require a satisfying ending.

The film or the creation must be crafted with skill and confidence to be effective, but it also must have an ending to elicit ticket sales. Otherwise, the audience will be much smaller and the film seldom watched more than once.

Copyright © 2018 by CJ Powers

5 Motifs of a Redemptive Movie

© ktsdesign - Fotolia.comThe most repetitive conversation I had at a recent conference was about the difference between redemptive and faith-based stories. They shared that a redemptive film has five motifs that permeate the story, which delivers a single message. In contrast, faith-based films do not have commonality of format, form, or motifs, and always have multiple messages within the story.

The simplicity of a single message within a redemptive film allows the filmmaker to explore the story from the key perspective of each motif—impacting the audience with a demonstration of how to implement the message within their personal lives.

Here are the five motifs of a redemptive film that are both demonstrated and emphasized:

  1. Moral character: The film demonstrates what moral and immoral actions look like. It also demonstrates both in its proper light, distinguishing between right and wrong. Many times these issues are demonstrated or revealed through the attributes of the main character facing a moral dilemma.
  2. Judgement breaking moral law, making mistakes, or being disobedient: The consequences of breaking the film’s moral code is demonstrated. The ramifications that impact others is also demonstrated.
  3. Blessings of faith in and obedience to moral standards: The blessings and good fortune of obedience is demonstrated. When outside circumstances hinder or attack the blessings, the filmmaker demonstrates the internalized good or blessings that remain.
  4. Unmerited sacrificial love that covers another’s moral dilemma: This act of selflessness always heightens the climax of the story, as it is the single most impactful act that anyone could give another—or that anyone could receive. Sometimes it’s done to redeem the main character and other times the main character does it to redeem another after having become a changed person. Regardless of who makes the sacrifice, the main character’s need for someone to save him is first made clear.
  5. What a moral world would look like: This short sequence demonstrates what the benefits of following in the main character’s footsteps looks like. While it might not be a perfect utopia, it becomes clear it is a more fulfilling life.

Act one typically introduces us to a character who is likeable in spite of his moral waverings. He soon faces a circumstance that forces him into act two where he explores both the moral and immoral sides of every issue hinted at in the first act, including outcomes and ramifications. By the third act someone makes a sacrifice to right the character from his bad choices, giving him a chance to demonstrate sacrificial love to others. At the end of the film we see what the main character’s new life looks like as a result of him embracing the gift of grace he received.

The audience goes home having vicariously experienced the very things demonstrated in the movie. They have the opportunity to embrace the positive decisions to see if they, too, can experience the same beneficial outcome of a sacrificial lifestyle.

Faith-based films don’t set up the audience to vicariously explore the good and bad options as well as the outcomes—most only show the good. Instead, the audience is informed about what is the right and wrong way of living and have to decide if what’s preached has merit. And if it does have merit in their personal life, they have the information, but without any demonstration of how to apply or implement changes in their life.

What distinguishes these two types of films is driven by the audience. Faith-based audiences demand the films are based on ideals and are generally family friendly and safe for all ages. Redemptive audiences desire the raw truth and the practical applications to implement into their own lives what is demonstrated on screen. Faith-based films are also pushed to be overt in preaching their numerous messages, while redemptive films must lightly salt their single message into the story where it fits organically.

Faith-based audiences are firm on this issue because they don‘t ever want the filmmaker to appear weak in his or her stand on spiritual issues—not wanting to “deny Christ” with anything less than the overt message. Redemptive film audiences want to, after watching the demonstration of the main character’s choices, make their own decision about whether or not the filmmaker’s message is right for them. They don’t want anything “forced down their throats.”

There is a place for both types of films in the market, but clarity can reduce the confusion on what the audience can expect. To over simplify the matter:

  • Redemptive films organically demonstrate a single message to the general public.
  • Faith-based films preach numerous messages to the like-minded or proverbial choir.

By the way, for the fans of faith-based films, the stories shared by Jesus were redemptive stories, but that’s a topic for another blog some day.

Copyright © 2018 by CJ Powers