Tried & True #14 — Avoiding the Not-So-Dream Cast

Every story creates an artistic expression from which an emotion rises to invoke change within its audience. That emotional pulse brings a rhythm to the screen based on the look, feel and actions of the characters. Rarely does the director have the opportunity to hand pick his cast based on his analysis of the screenplay, but when it happens…Everyone is positively impacted by it.

auditionsMost films are not made with a dream team cast, however, directors do have the opportunity to mix and match the actors to find a new formula that can also bring about an emotional change factor, albeit a variation from the original intent. The alternative can some times generate a greater impact, while at other times it will fall short.

In the independent world of Tried & True, our developers picked a dream team that would perfectly contour the film to meet our original commitment. But, with the changes made in the screenplay’s focus and the shifting of the love story to the B-plotline, what was an earlier rejected not-so-dream cast has once again been placed back on the table for consideration.

Actors Rejected Then Re-Selected

I feel for the actors that get rejected by a director during the audition process. Each has earned their right to win a role, but none of them can know how the perceived character traits might instantly be adjusted when a lead unexpectedly changes – Forcing the recasting of supporting characters.

PacinoIn Tried & True, Antonio Marcellus is an Italian mobster who hires our hero’s father to bring about his 24th exoneration. He is impeccably dressed with the latest fashion, loaded down with expensive jewelry and sports a jet-black ponytail. Al Pacino was our first choice based on whom we selected as our hero. Since our lead never got to contract, we shifted to a new lead, which forced a new mobster. We then looked at Mark Strong, but our lead changed again and we considered yet another actor.

In the meantime, we were simultaneously considering Gary Oldman, Kevin Costner and Mark Strong for the role of Alten Stafford, our hero’s father. These men are all excellent actors with managers that can protect them from this yoyo approach, which continues to change until all leads are signed. In our case, we have three leads that must first be perfectly balanced in screen strength for the story to work.

The shifting of schedules, changes in budget and higher offers that remove talent from the negotiation table create the yoyo effect – All because the director wants the best possible combination. Thankfully the rejected actors know that a change in fit caused the rejection, not their skill. Still, I feel for actors who fit and then don’t because the lead was changed, especially if they become a fit again once yet another lead signs.

Supporting Cast Supports, Not Outshines

The other element that can lead to a not-so-dream cast comes about when a supporting actor is hired that outshines the lead. While this sometimes sneaks up on a director due to an oversight in auditions, it becomes obvious to everyone once the film hits the silver screen.

A friend of mine was hired to play a lead in a drama. Her greatest performance was captured in a scene that would have been ideal for her next reel, but a supporting character overshadowed her. Had she included it in her reel, she would have lost all credibility as an actor. Unfortunately, the director focused so much on the supporting characters that the leads were undermined, the story wavered and the film flopped.

Its incidences like those that cause the rejected actors to be thankful they weren’t cast. Everyone loses when a supporting character outshines a lead and only the director has the control to make sure it doesn’t happen. This can also be the time when it becomes painfully obvious when a director has hired a friend or a relative to play a role they aren’t suited for.

I’ve come to the conclusion that no matter how much you want to work with a certain actor, the story should drive the talent selection process. And, those actors who are patient and great at what they do, will eventually find ideal roles from directors fulfilling their story requirements over their desires.

As for Tried & True, the latest script changes have forced us to relook at the leads, and therefore the entire cast. Some characters will probably survive the change like Detective Yeager who I’d like to fill with a specific theater character actor. Other roles will continue to change until the last lead actor is signed.

Copyright © 2014 by CJ Powers

Tried & True #13 – The Director’s Horrifying Rewrite

© Pixelbliss - Fotolia.comWhen I think about Friday the 13th and all of its horror, I can’t help but consider the horrifying feeling a writer gets when the director starts hacking at his work. It gets even more complicated when the writer is the director and a part of a team of writers, which is my case with Tried & True.

For the past two weeks I dove into my script analysis from a director’s vantage point. I found a dozen scenes that didn’t move the story forward and I also found half dozen scenes that need to be added to the story – All to focus the story more tightly on the protagonist.

Ruthless Script Analysis

I do several analysis passes on a script in order to prepare for filming and discussions with each of my department heads. During the process, it becomes obvious which scenes are cinematic and which ones would make for a nice Movie of the Week (MOW).

My standard is to make the story so fascinating and cinematic that it has to play on the big screen. I also want to make sure the story is easy to follow and any complexities are used more as a garnish for the discerning viewer, rather than a plot interrupter for those who can’t or choose not to follow such details.

What I find interesting about the process is how many scenes stay intact with minor changes that tweak the perspective. I expect the pacing of the film to increase with the add precision or focus on the main character’s goals, but no matter how many times I’ve done this I’m always amazed at the new clarity that rises within the plotlines.

Complex stories always fail at the box office, but simple stories surrounded in a complexity of details do extremely well. It’s like listening to a great speaker. If he’s on point with his message, no matter how many supporting facts or stories he shares, people will always walk away knowing his specific three points with a desire to implement his recommendation.

Horrifying Cuts Bring Happiness

So the hacking began and I noticed a slight twitch in my pride. It was hard cutting scenes, but the final read was well worth it. Not to mention the benefits of reducing the page count to something more palatable for a courtroom drama.

I also noticed that the process helped me catch the typical contrived scenes that always seep into family friendly films. While these trite scenes have no place in a drama, they are endearing and hard to cut. The only solace received from cutting these scenes comes from the fact that no one notices they were cut. In other words, since they didn’t advance the story they couldn’t be missed.

Considering what elements in a scene must remain or be shifted to another scene makes for an interesting process. I sometimes wonder if I completely deleted a scene would it impact or change the story. If there is no impact, then it is one that must be cut. If, however, a couple elements are important, but could be relocated, then the scene is also worth cutting.

It’s only when the scene elements are so well integrated into the scene and critically important to the story that I have to keep it in the script. In those cases, I may have to find a way to punch up the scene to something worthy of the silver screen, or reanalyze the story structure to make sure I hadn’t veered off the path of clarity.

Horrified Co-Writers

One of the biggest issues during the analysis process is making sure you do something to save face for the other writers. I’m fortunate with Tried & True screenwriter Guy Cote, as he is always willing to bend on scene content when the replacement idea is far better or more focused than the previous draft.

Producer Anthony DeRosa is also willing to bend if he knows the scene works better for our audience. Since the film was written for Millennials, with added scenes that will help the Baby Boomers to embrace the story, we have quite the fine line to walk in how each scene is presented.

As for the Gen X audience, they too should be pleased with the story, but none of the scene elements were created with them in mind. However, GenXers are very resilient from having to play middleman between the Millennials and Baby Boomers that they will certainly be able to enjoy the story, if not embrace it.

Well, its time to get back to the script, as I’m still trying to figure out how to get rid of one last contrived scene. I’m hoping to shift into preproduction in the near future with the hopes that we can begin filming in late August or early September. So, the only real horror would be if I couldn’t have the script ready in time. Happy Friday the 13th.

Copyright © 2014 by CJ Powers

The 8 Powerful Techniques that Influence Your Future

CapturedI was sucked in. I couldn’t break free from the moment. It was alarming to me. After all, I understood the techniques used by the media to manipulate those who didn’t take time for conscious consideration of their media intake. It actually snuck up on me last Saturday morning.

I lounged in bed reading numerous Internet articles on my iPad. The sun had already lit up my room, the birds were singing and I was comfy enough to stay put. I easily jumped from article to article, some humorous and others curiously addicting. After about an hour, I couldn’t help but notice that I continually was captured by one particular publication.

The ezine grabbed my attention from numerous locations. It didn’t matter if I started on Facebook, Flipbook or Instagram. Every time one of their articles was shared, I felt compelled to read it. I had been captured by my own curiosity and leveraged by the marketers who published the blog entries.

The answer to being influenced suddenly popped up in an article titled The Anatomy of a Perfect Blog Post. Author Kevin Lee wrote about the sciences used in capturing readers and generating shares. Social Media had matured to the point of using science to influence its readers.

The techniques were simple enough and had proven effective in my life until I gave careful consideration to what I was actually reading. It was only then that I regained control of the amount of impact the influential articles could make in my life. Here are the main categories I learned about.

How to Write the Perfect Headline

The science of testing and retesting a reader’s response to headlines shows that people scan the first three words and the last three words. This suggests that a six-word headline gets perfect readership. Since this is close to impossible to achieve with many blog entries, marketers tested other aspects of headline readership and came up with the ultimate headline formula.

Number + Adjective + Keyword + Rationale + Promise = The Ultimate Headline

Start Your Post with Storytelling

StoriesBlogs that start with a story obtain about 300% more readership than a post without a story. Blogs sharing a story in the beginning of the article keep their readers 520% longer than those without a story. This makes sense to me, as by nature our society loves to hear or read a good story.

Reduce Characters Per Line by Using Images

The fewer number of characters used on a page shortens the eye movement and increases the reader’s comprehension. In other words, its better to use a picture that takes up half the column and reduces the number of words running across the page than it is to use a full column width.

Use Lots of Subheadings

The use of subheadings allows the blog article to be easily scanned. This scan ability gives the reader a quick understanding about what elements of your thoughts shared might be important to them. It also lays out your ideas in an easy way to understand much like a book or speech outline – Adding to the readers comprehension and consideration of your ideas.

Write the Perfect Length of Content

Blog posts of 1,500 words receive more shares than shorter articles. My guess is that it’s long enough to provide substantial content that’s worth sharing. This also puts the time of readership around seven minutes, which is just under the 8-12 minute window we can handle watching on TV – That’s why commercials interrupt your show every 8-12 minutes.

Add Tweetables When Possible

By making your post quotable, people will Tweet your comments. This is now done by placing a “Tweet This” or “Share This” link alongside the text. The old fashion way is to manually code a Tweet link.

Time Your Post for the Weekend

5 Steps to Take an Idea to ScriptSaturdays and Sundays get far more readership of blogs than any other day. This is due mostly to the lack of blogs published on weekends. Less competition means more readership, not to mention that weekends provide more time for people lounging in bed with their iPads.

A Call to Action

Topping off the list of techniques is a call to action. Suggesting that people do something about what they read inspires them to embrace what you’ve shared, especially if it is actionable, relatable, urgent, visual, solution-based, entertaining and definitive.

So, there you have it. The 8 techniques that caught me off guard. The only way I found to counter its effect, was to give the articles I read my conscious consideration, which put me back into the drivers seat and slowed my compulsory reading.

I hope you’ve found this information interesting and that you add these tools into your readership tool belt so you know when someone is trying to influence you. It’s only then that you can purposely take time to consider if you’ll receive and embrace the message to improve your life or discard it to protect it.