Taking Back Our Culture

When I was a little boy, I was taught to stand when the flag came by during a parade. It was a sign of respect for those who gave their lives in order for me to have the freedom to develop my voice – This blog and my films. Freedom of speech and religion were God given rights that our country embraced during my childhood years.

The idea of helping people in need was also ingrained into my daily life as a child, not by words alone, but by the demonstration of my family. My parents were both civil servants who were highly respected in our community and I learned how to give back, by watching them.

God and Country was very important to me and the generation before me spent their blood, sweat and tears making sure that I had the freedoms to worship God and serve my country. Unfortunately, the media rewrote that childhood and led many in recent years to silence their freedoms of speech and religion.

Today, there are few of the youngest generation that have an independent voice, rather than a communal one. Their decisions aren’t based on what is right, but instead on what sort of works for the squeakiest of community members. Instead of helping people to get into line with what is right, they give allowances to others, even when the effects hurt the community.

I’m tired of watching our culture of defending what is right give way to what is stylish at the time. I’m exhausted by individuals who can no longer share what is on their hearts, but instead share only what is politically correct to share. I want our country to be authentic and strive once again to be great with innovation, compassion and excellence.

I have decided to step forward and take a stance. I am committing to create art and entertainment for the media that will reposition our culture to what is right, and once again give voice to each individual. I will develop stories that bring the focus back to God and country, giving new life to our precious freedoms. And, I shall endeavor to be innovative, compassionate and excellent in the process.

Please take time to comment below or email me if you are willing to stand with me in this pledge. To be successful, I’ll need prayer warriors, fans, and investors to make it possible. Together we can make a difference. Together we can take back our culture.

May God Bless America.

Copyright © 2012 by CJ Powers

7 Steps to Determine if a Script is Worth Shooting

I’ve read hundreds of scripts as a festival judge and director over the years and I’ve found 7 steps that help me determine if a script is worth shooting. The 7 steps are ideal for assessing if the story is visually compelling with believable characters.

Since I will be writing about the “main character”, “protagonist” or “Hero” throughout this article, I’ll just call him “Mick” (the Most Important Character Known) to simplify what I share.

1. THE HUMAN CONDITION

During the first read of the script it’s important to recognize if the story points out Mick’s natural flaw. Since we’re all flawed, the film won’t be received as believable if Mick doesn’t have one. Films that have “good” people becoming “better” won’t work, as people won’t be able to relate to an inauthentic Mick. The script needs a flawed Mick who we can embrace.

A great script also reveals what makes Mick do the things he does. These motivations must be presented in a visual manner within the script with lots of verbs, not adjectives. This will give the director a quick handle on how he can visualize the exploration of Mick’s life.

2. THE ACTION PLOTLINE

The script must be clear about the story elements like who the characters are, the location of the action, what form of growth or change happens to Mick, and so on. After the first read, the following questions can be answered to clarify if the story makes sense:

      • What is the story about?
      • Can it be explained in 2 sentences or 30 seconds?
      • Was the story easy to follow and understand?
      • Are the obvious problems easy to correct?
      • What is the theme of the story?
      • Can all plotlines be easily listed?
      • Can the story beats be easily picked out?
      • Does the climax make a profound or emotional impact?

Further analysis can be done on a scene-by-scene basis. The following questions can help determine if a scene might hit the cutting room floor or survive:

      • Does the scene raise a question or resolve a previous question?
      • In what way does the scene advance the story?
      • How many power exchanges are within the scene?
      • How often does the emotional status of the scene change?

3. THE MOTIVATION

Mick must drive the action plot and requires some form of motivation to do so. Reviewing the script elements that drive Mick’s behavior to change from his flawed human condition to something greater must be in place for the action plotline to take the audience on a journey.

The script elements must infer what Mick thinks, how he feels, and thereby what his actions , which all serve to drive the story forward. To establish Mick’s motivation, the script must have some form of objective laced within the story. It needs to be clear and concise. The following questions can help determine Mick’s motivation:

      • What does Mick want to do throughout the story?
      • What does Mick want to do in each scene?
      • What is Mick doing versus what he is saying?
      • How does Mick’s choices drive the audience to the next scene?
      • What is Mick willing to sacrifice to obtain his objective?

4. THE JUXTAPOSITION OF IMAGES

All great films are a series of shots that tell a story. While many think the dialog is the most important part, it is actually the selection of shots in a series that reveals the essence of the story. My favorite types of films are those that can be watched and understood with the sound turned off. Here is a shot list to make the point:

      • A single long stem rose is held behind a man’s back.
      • A man’s hand knocks on a door.
      • A woman’s hand turns the doorknob.
      • The door swings open past long legs and red high heels.
      • The rose is pulled out from behind the back.
      • A man’s hand places the rose into a woman’s hand.
      • The man’s feet fidget.
      • The rose flies across the room.
      • The rose lands in a wastebasket.
      • A woman’s hand pushes against a man’s chest.
      • The man’s feet shuffle backwards.
      • The door swings closed.

The above shot list was my rendition of Mick trying to make up for a mistake with the woman he loved. The shots suggested that she pushed him back into the doghouse for a bit more time, rejecting his attempt at reconciliation.

The simple positioning of the individual shots generates the audience’s creativity and allows them to draw on their own emotional backgrounds to understand what the shots meant. If the script doesn’t suggest a certain series of visual opportunities in the story, it may be better as a book rather than a film.

5. THE CAMERA’S PERSPECTIVE

Great scripts hint at camera movement, position and point of view. Bad scripts tell the director what type of shot to use. Determining if the writer is a would-be cinematographer or is excellent at his craft by merely suggesting possibilities will help a discerning director to determine the cinematic language of the film.

A helpful script suggests if the camera view is:

      • Objective: This type of camera positioning gives the audience an outsider’s look at the story, as if they were standing at the fourth wall looking on.
      • Subjective: This placement is typically within the action itself, rather than at a “safe” distance, pulling the audience into the scene. The shaky camera technique is subjective as it makes the audience feel like they are in the story.
      • POV: This camera angle is typically set up by a subjective series of shots and then reveals what Mick is seeing.

The emotional tone and pace of the film determines which of the above types of camera shots are best used. Regardless of the suggestion hinted at in the script, the director needs to understand how the shots would drive the central idea or super objective of the story forward. Whatever shots take away from that goal should be changed.

6. THE MOVEMENT OF CHARACTERS

Scenes that suggest movement based on human reactions greatly support the director’s vision. Since every director needs to block the actors in relationship to the camera and other characters, any suggested movement within the story would simplify the shoot.

To determine if the story is mostly made up of talking heads or physical action, the following questions can be considered:

      • Where was Mick located in the last scene?
      • Where will Mick start in the current scene?
      • Will the juxtaposition of A and B impact the story?
      • In real life, what would Mick’s natural movement be in the scene?
      • Is Mick increased or diminished in the scene?
      • Should Mick be closer to or farther from the camera?
      • Would an angle shot increase the emotions of the scene?
      • If the scene is intimate, will a steady close-up work?
      • If the scene is active, would tight shots increase the emotional intensity or distract the audience from understanding the action?

It’s important to understand that the above list is a fraction of the possibilities. It should also be noted that Mick’s movement could be created by him moving or by the director moving the camera.

7. THE IT

Great films are great because of all the story elements that come together. Scripts that help the director to visualize the location and production design, the cinematography and sound with music and effects, the editing potential and pacing, and anything else highly unique like stunts, special effects, and whatever else will take filmmaking to the next level, all make up the thing we call “it”.

The “it” is the synergy that makes the story spectacular, well beyond the sum of the filmic elements that brought the film into being. It is that panache that can’t be created, but shows up. Simply put, it is those elements that make the story universal for all audiences, while being specifically unique as if no niche market has ever seen it before.

When a director finds a script that has all 7 steps showing up in strength within the story he’s considering, he finds his passion for the story growing beyond what he’s capable of holding in. He must tell the story. Anything shy of this isn’t worth the time or effort.

Copyright © 2012 by CJ Powers

5 Exercises to Break the Bias

I met with three businessmen yesterday and they all had the election on their mind. Their key concern was how the media manipulates the message to persuade the populus vote.

One businessman talked about Christopher Nolan’s latest Batman movie and how it seemed to send a message about our country’s problems being caused by the small business owner. The man’s concern was birthed in the fact that small buisness owners employ more people than any other company, second to the government.

So here’s the situation. If small business owners get hit with higher taxes, thousands of companies would be forced to reduce their headcount, creating the worst unemployment disaster our country has ever seen. And, the situation becomes more volital when the media informs the people that the opposite is true – Even in Batman.

So, the businessman’s follow up question was straight forward. How do we discern the truth from the media’s lies?

A good starting point is understanding the number one way bias occurs in the news.

Veteran CBS reporter Bernard Goldberg suggests that extra effort doesn’t need to be exerted to lace a story with propaganda, since the liberal messages in the news just happen as a result of the reporter’s own beliefs and life styles. He states, “The old argument that the networks and other ‘media elites’ have a liberal bias is so blatantly true that it’s hardly worth discussing anymore. No, we don’t sit around in dark corners and plan strategies on how we’re going to slant the news. We don’t have to. It comes naturally to most reporters.”[i]

Since the news is a genre within the television industry, it is constrained by the parameters established within the arts and sciences of its production values. Simplified, television “is the act of transmitting information, ideas, and attitudes from one person to another.”[ii] The person sending the message may or may not take a significant amount of time to mold or plan his or her message prior to it being sent.

Some times, like in the case of fast-breaking television news broadcasts, there is very little time to prepare the messages, let alone develop liberal angles for its presentation. The result is off the cuff news presentations as the information trickles in a little bit at a time, as was the case on September 11, 2001.

The first story on that historic day suggested that up to 50,000 people might have been killed in the World Trade Center towers. Once more detail became available to the reporters, the stories were corrected to suggest that on any one given day there are approximately 30,000 people present in the towers. Within a couple of hours the reports suggested that many individuals were evacuated, leaving about 6,000 in the towers’ remains. Days later, the number of individuals lost at ground zero dropped to around 4,000. A few weeks later, the final count of those who died in the attack on the World Trade Center was 3,016 people. This was followed by a corrected statement of 2,606 – Folowed by another corection of “nearly 3,000 people.”

Regardless of the slow stream of facts entering the newsroom, the reporter is aware of the need to fill time during a live broadcast in as professional of a way as is possible. To accomplish this the newscaster must think quickly and come up with words off the top of his or her head. Since the best way of doing this is by drawing from experience, many comments will have his or her liberal or convservative slant — Bias.

Here are some activities that can help your family become more aware of how the media impacts the news you watch.

Family Activities

1.   Videotape the News: What would happen if you videotaped the news and watched it multiple times? Do the “live” or “urgent” feelings you receive while watching the news disappear? Can you more easily separate the hype from the facts of a story? Are you able to discern “what if” statements that raise curiosity? Can you find neutral, factual words from those slanted right or left?

2.   Outline the Stories: What would happen if you created an outline, titling each news story in a memorable way? Would certain types of stories jump out at you, or would you see a pattern developing over a period of a week? Would you be able to discern the bias of the news team and its potential agenda? Can you detect if certain types of stories always follow a given pattern? Are the opening news stories alarming and do the closing ones act as a teaser for another newscast, or do they reflect good will? By having one of your kids time the length of the news stories, can they determine if it’s enough time to give factual details or only promotional hype?

3.   Determine the Program’s Format: Is the newscast done in a magazine, newsroom, or stand-up format? Is the room functional for news or designed with flashy electronics to keep your attention? Is special eye-catching lighting used during the news? What about the clothing – do the field reporter’s outfits enhance or detract from the story or surroundings? Does the reporter look better than life? Does the overall conservative visual image of the sets and reporter’s clothing help you accept a liberal bias without consideration?

4.   Create a Family Newscast: Can you get your kids involved in creating a news story to share with the family? What would happen if you created a conservative setting, dressed them in their Sunday bests, designed conservative poster boards highlighting the news story, and then let your kids share a liberal bias? Would the rest of the family catch the bias or be swayed in their judgment? What would happen if you first hyped the story by stating biased feelings as if they were facts – would everyone assume what you say is true?

5.   Establish Family Benchmarks: What types of questions to help analyze the news can your family come up with from a brainstorming session? Can you develop questions that reflect an opposite perspective from the reporter’s? What time-tested value or character trait will you use to establish a standard for comparisons of information.

Copyright © 2012 by CJ Powers

[i] Bernard Goldberg, Bias (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 2002), p. 13.
[ii] Warren K. Agee and others, Introduction To Mass Communications (Harper & Row), p. 4.