How Thinkers Can Harmonize with Feelers

I’ll never forget popping in to visit a logical friend trying to meet a deadline. He had been up for 30 hours, with 10 hours to go and no viable solution. I asked him if I could help, and he erupted in laughter, too tired to respond tactfully.

I suggested that if he gave me a shot, the worst that could happen is that he’d still be where he was, and the best thing was he’d be working on a new solution. He appeased me and told me the goal, what he had done to date, and some critical elements.

Since I think very differently than most, I asked a couple of questions and then made a recommendation. He quickly tried my suggestion in his programming and had a working model minutes later. He was blown away at how many hours he spent using logical principles to find a technical solution, and then I walked in without the needed knowledge and gave him the base solution.

He had a polished program six hours later and turned it in with four hours to spare. To this day, he can’t figure out how his expertise and logical process couldn’t do in 30 hours what his unknowledgeable, intuitive friend did in 20 minutes.

But, he was grateful that our collaboration and synergy got the job done, and his client loved the solution.

Thinkers and Feelers

Every day, we face two types of decision-makers: Thinkers and Feelers. Unfortunately, most only communicate well with one of those groups while unintentionally diminishing the value of the other.

In my Signature Talk, “Cinematic Advantage: Creating Memorable Conversations and Presentations,” I share how to speak to both groups of people at the same time without alienating either. But today, I will share several strategies Thinkers can use to harmonize with Feelers.

First, you need to know that the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Thinkers (“T”), and Feelers (“F”) often form complementary partnerships, merging the realms of logical and emotional reasoning. They work well together when we focus on content appropriately.

However, melding these distinct thinking styles, especially in personal and professional environments, sometimes presents communication and mutual understanding hurdles. Below are several strategies Thinkers can employ to harmonize with the Feelers in their circle, fostering an atmosphere of compromise and teamwork while fostering a sense of joy.

1. Radiate Positivity: Non-Verbal Cues Matter

Feelers navigate using an emotional compass, highly receptive to verbal and non-verbal signals. Regardless of what is said, they will pick up on anyone filled with tension. Therefore, approaching sensitive discussions requires tranquility.

Mastering calmness through deep breathing exercises before sensitive conversations is crucial. Moreover, being mindful of our body language, from arm positioning to posture, can prevent conveying the wrong intent. When conversing with a Feeler on sensitive issues, these vital attributes require our focus.

2. Embrace Patience and Respect

Driven by empathy, Feelers prioritize others’ well-being, often at the expense of directness in their conversation. They tend to prioritize harmony over conflict, making honest emotional expression difficult.

Recognizing this, Thinkers should afford Feelers the latitude to articulate their thoughts fully despite circumstances. While Thinkers’ decisiveness is invaluable, appreciating diverse thought processes enhances interpersonal dynamics.

3. Foster a Culture of Honesty

Given Feelers’ aversion to upsetting the status quo, Thinkers should initiate spaces for candid dialogues, particularly regarding mutual expectations. Establishing a safe, welcoming environment that prioritizes transparent communication over diplomatic evasion encourages Feelers to voice their authentic thoughts, benefiting the collective in the long run. This will require Thinkers who want to benefit from the experience to maintain self-control and an open mind.

4. Prioritize Emotional Intelligence

While Thinkers instinctively seek pragmatic solutions, Feelers operate on an emotional frequency. Responding to Feelers’ concerns with stark logic can appear indifferent and will hinder productive conversation.

Striving to comprehend the emotions coloring their words, even without personally experiencing them, cultivates patience and fosters a climate where Feelers feel validated and inclined towards cooperation. They will become significant assets as they share the beneficial insights missed by Thinkers.

5. Identify Optimal Communication Channels

Understanding and aligning communication preferences is vital. For instance, while a Thinker might find text messages efficient, a Feeler could perceive them as detached, potentially triggering unwarranted concerns.

Transparency about communication styles and a willingness to adapt can mitigate misunderstandings and facilitate effective problem-solving. Also, remember that Feelers can read body language and overlook misspoken words, but not through texting.

6. Avoid Dismissing Their Emotions with Logic

Thinkers’ problem-solving prowess is commendable but not always appropriate when interacting with Feelers, who require emotional processing. Observing a Feeler dissect situations emotionally, though potentially perplexing, is akin to a Thinker’s logical evidence gathering.

Disregarding their methodology or displaying impatience can cause them to withdraw. Instead, offering empathetic support while they navigate their emotional journey is more constructive.

7. Validate Their Intuitive Strengths

Feelers, attuned to their emotions, often exhibit remarkable intuition. Their seemingly spontaneous logical conclusions stem from their deep emotional intelligence.

Discrediting this intuition can alienate them, whereas acknowledging its significance can ease collaborative efforts and enhance mutual trust. I’ve often found that most Feeler’s intuition is often more accurate than the short-term compiled data of Thinkers.

8. Provide Gentle Guidance

Balancing the relationship entails utilizing Thinkers’ logical prowess without overshadowing Feelers. Assisting them in navigating their emotional decision-making labyrinth by posing pertinent questions or refocusing their attention can be invaluable.

This synergy between Thinkers’ analytical abilities and Feelers’ emotional insights has transformative potential.

Embrace Openness

Effective communication with a Feeler doesn’t necessitate suppressing a Thinker’s inherent traits. Authenticity, coupled with a willingness to venture into emotional expressions, lays the foundation for profound connections.

This openness might involve Thinkers stepping out of their comfort zone, but in Feelers, this vulnerability is welcomed and reciprocated. As these personalities complement each other, a Feeler’s rationality can surface in response to a Thinker’s emotive side.

Through such heartfelt interactions, collaborative discussions thrive, enriching both parties.

Copyright © 2023 by CJ Powers

A Director’s Take on Auditions

Photo by cottonbro studio on Pexels.com

Auditions are a critical aspect of the filmmaking process, and as a director, it’s essential to know what to look for in actors during these sessions. The audition process can be lengthy and challenging. Still, a director can find the perfect fit for their film by focusing on three key areas:

  • Observe the actor’s capabilities
  • Determine the actor’s chemistry with cast members
  • Ensure the actor can take direction and explore collaborative choices

Observing the Actor’s Capabilities

One of the most crucial things a director should look for in an audition is the actor’s capabilities. This involves examining the actor’s range, ability to convey emotions and portray characters accurately.

To assess these capabilities, directors can provide actors with monologues or scenes that challenge their acting skills. The scene can be a simple interaction between two people or involve more complex emotions and conflicts. The goal is to get the actor to play and interact in a manner that reveals their capable range.

During the audition, directors should look for the following traits in the actor’s performance:

  • Authenticity: Actors should be able to embody the character they are auditioning for and make it believable. They should be able to evoke the character’s emotions, mannerisms, and speech patterns to make the character come to life.
  • Versatility: The best actors have a deep range and can take on different roles and genres. Look for actors who can perform different emotions and characters with ease.
  • Presence: Actors should have a presence that commands attention. They should be able to captivate the audience with their performance and hold their attention.

Determine the Actor’s Chemistry with Cast Members

Chemistry between cast members is vital for a film’s success. Actors should be able to work well together, establish trust and rapport with one another, and create believable relationships on screen.

During auditions, directors can pair up actors and see how they interact with one another. Directors should look for actors who can create chemistry naturally and authentically. The result of strong chemistry appears in the form of challenging tension and natural acceptance.

The following are some factors to consider when evaluating chemistry:

  • Compatibility: Directors should look for actors who share similar energy and can complement each other’s performances.
  • Communication: Actors should be able to communicate well with each other and create a sense of camaraderie.
  • Adaptability: Actors should be able to adapt to each other’s acting styles and make changes to their performance if necessary.

Ensure the Actor can Take Direction and explore Collaborative Choices

Directors should look for actors willing to take direction and explore various solutions to a scene. During auditions, directors can provide actors with feedback and see how they respond to it. Actors who can take direction and make changes to their performance show they are open to collaboration and willing to work towards a shared vision for the film.

The following are some factors to consider when evaluating an actor’s ability to take direction:

  • Flexibility: Actors should be able to adjust their performance and adapt to the director’s vision.
  • Creativity: Actors who can explore different ways of performing a scene can offer new insights and ideas that enhance the overall film.
  • Collaborative Spirit: Actors open to feedback and working with others can create a positive and productive working environment on set.

The audition process is a crucial step in filmmaking, and directors should know what to look for in actors during this process. Observing an actor’s capabilities, determining the actor’s chemistry with cast members, and ensuring the actor can take direction and explore collaborative choices are all key factors in finding the right actor for a role. With these factors in mind, directors can make informed casting decisions that result in compelling and authentic performances that bring their film to life.

Copyright © 2023 by CJ Powers

Dialog must be Relational

Conversation is about Relationship, Not Information.

pexels-photo-89873There are talkers and there are listeners that will hopefully never meet. They’re missing the chief cornerstone of relationship when only focused on half of the equation. Talking and listening actively is relationship.

Talkers can never learn or be satisfied until they listen equally as well. The listeners will bust at the seams until they share the valuable information stored within their heart. Communication is the only relational tool that unites the human race and forms culture.

During one film shoot, I directed a group of actors who were very different from their characters. The joy on set was high, as the talent played with roles that stretched their imagination beyond the stereotypical. After great contemplation they delivered heartfelt performances that opened our eyes to new perspectives.

One woman, who was an intellectual, played a ditzy blonde type that had a heart for kids. Her research brought the perception that “ditzy” was based on circumstances of how the person addressed the unknown. Curtailing the stereotype, she resisted playing the person that when jolted by a comment would say the first words that came to her.

She entered the scene as a brunette who led with undefined empathy, which became clear by the end of the scene. The actor’s choice gave the feeling of “ditzy,” but without showing a lack of intelligence. This resulted in the character coming across as empathetic and what I called squishy-warmhearted.

This empathetic quality came out because of the conversation between her and another leader. The dialog revealed the heart of both people and their relationship. It was more than just an exchange of information. The expressions of each character’s souls were on the line, demonstrating their courage in conversing.

Ursula K. Le Guin in her essay titled “Telling is Listening” published in The Wave in the Mind: Talks and Essays on the Writer, the Reader, and the Imagination, shared the following complexities of human communication:

“In most cases of people actually talking to one another, human communication cannot be reduced to information. The message not only involves, it is, a relationship between speaker and hearer. The medium in which the message is embedded is immensely complex, infinitely more than a code: it is a language, a function of a society, a culture, in which the language, the speaker, and the hearer are all embedded.”

The film was powerful because each character did more than communicate information. Their expressions and backstory came through in how they presented each comment. Even their reaction shots revealed how they were impacted through the courageous interchange.

The audience was mesmerized and fascinated by the dialog, not because it was written well, but because of how it was crafted using the embedded elements of each character within the exchange. The dialog was far more than words or information. It was real in everyway.

I made an interesting note the night after the shoot that read, “Dialog is about relationship, not information.” Whether a discussion occurs in real life or on screen, it is only of value if it develops the relationship. Talkers who talk without listening and listeners who listen without sharing are not interesting because they are only focused on themselves.

© 2017 by CJ Powers