Which has Stronger Influence on Society?

I read several statistics that I have combined in charts. The numbers were all captured for 2012 by prominent organizations including Movieguide, the Motion Picture Association of America, Crown Ministries, Fox News and several less known organizations.

Due to the disparity of the groups and the reasons behind each survey or statistical analysis, you might consider taking this article with a grain of salt, but it does ring true for me based on what I’ve seen within both the faith-based and general film industry.

The studies were conducted to determine the amount of influence different types of organizations and films make on society. This is nothing new, as the impact of film on society has been studied since the early 1960s. The impact of movies on people’s purchases has been studying since the 1950s. There may have been other studies done earlier, since the motion picture industry dates back to the early 1900s, but there is little documentation available that addresses how stories influence society.

When I’ve interviewed independent filmmakers, the number one reason faith-based producers make movies is to influence the culture, but they only influence like-minded people according to the latest statistics. Most general filmmakers influence both people of faith and the secular public without the intention of influencing society. However, the general filmmakers that produced with the specific intent on influencing society find their films getting minimal distribution.

Patriotic films generate more gross revenue than any other film genre in the history of the American film industry. The second largest grossing films include a redemptive story and make four times more revenue than general films, while a faith-based film draws 10 times less audience than a general film.

This suggests that producers who want to influence society need to make a film for the general viewing audience with a redemptive or patriotic storyline. Most patriotic films include scenes dealing with self-sacrifice for the sake of others and respectfully represent God and country. Most redemptive films include scenes dealing with sacrificial love and the redemption of common man.

I was surprised to learn that pastors have one-tenth the amount of influence that movies have over their congregations. And, it’s even more surprising that the number of unbelievers they influence is dramatically less. These statistics suggest those with conservative Judeo-Christian worldviews need to start making more films for the general audience – Influencing them along the topics of self-sacrifice, patriotism, good work ethics, and treating others with respect.

Surprisingly Entertaining

Alone Yet Not AloneThis morning I read the headline “Surprisingly Entertaining” and I couldn’t figure out if it was a cut or a pat on the back for the filmmaker. After giving some thought to it, I realized it was both.

The headline introduced an article about the latest Christian film Alone Yet Not Alone, which received an original song nomination that was rescinded in a bath of controversy. The headline was a positive stroke for the filmmaker who made the movie entertaining. The negative side of the comment was a statement about the lack of entertainment value in Christian films.

I’ve written a lot about the Christian film industry this year, as it has emerged into the limelight. The most fascinating elements of its adolescence include arguments on what makes a film Christian, fans supporting films based on message instead of quality and entertainment value, and the lack of hours the cast and crew typically put into honing their craft to achieve mastership of their skills.

The unique combination of these issues has settled the argument in Hollywood and among industry leaders who have labeled Christian films as a genre. Even the top theatrical revenue reporting organizations have referenced the same label. Yet, many Christian filmmakers continue to argue that Christian films are not a genre unto themselves, as their films can fit any genre.

However, no matter what the Christian producers try to clarify, there isn’t a large Christian film association that can dictate anything differently than what the masses and industry has deemed to be the case. Nor can anyone suggest things are different from the massive number of Christian films that all fit into the same category.

The bottom line is that very few Christian films are entertaining and it’s therefore a surprise when one picture entertains – thus the headline.

The foregone conclusion is that audiences want entertainment value. Christian producers on the other hand want to preach a message or need to preach in order to fulfill the demands of their investors. I believe that need to fulfill certain religious requirements comes from leaders who have preached for years the “sins” of entertainment and therefore need to justify their entrance into the media with overt religious content in order to distinguish it from “sinful” entertainment.

But entertainment is neutral. It was never a sin. Certainly there is wholesome entertainment and there is secular entertainment, but neither in of itself is sin. It’s man’s reaction or choices that brings about sins or blessings. The media is neutral and can be used to bring a single message into the mind of the audience, regardless of what that message is.

I’ve worked on hundreds of television episodes for several networks and shot seven films in my career. But none of my moral and wholesome shows were ever labeled “Christian”, so I can’t relate to those who set out to make Christian films — Although three of my pictures were released to the “Christian” marketplace.

However, I can relate to audiences, as I’ve watched films from all genres and I have concluded that the number one goal of all filmmakers that want to touch millions of lives is to entertain them. And, if they can make a single life altering point within the context of their film they’ll receive a significant response from gratified viewers.

In other words, the less entertainment values in a film, the smaller the viewing audience, and, the more universal the story the greater the audience. This simple formula dictates which Christian films get large distribution and those that release direct to video for showings in churches. It all comes down to the film’s level of entertainment.

Tried & True #14 — Avoiding the Not-So-Dream Cast

Every story creates an artistic expression from which an emotion rises to invoke change within its audience. That emotional pulse brings a rhythm to the screen based on the look, feel and actions of the characters. Rarely does the director have the opportunity to hand pick his cast based on his analysis of the screenplay, but when it happens…Everyone is positively impacted by it.

auditionsMost films are not made with a dream team cast, however, directors do have the opportunity to mix and match the actors to find a new formula that can also bring about an emotional change factor, albeit a variation from the original intent. The alternative can some times generate a greater impact, while at other times it will fall short.

In the independent world of Tried & True, our developers picked a dream team that would perfectly contour the film to meet our original commitment. But, with the changes made in the screenplay’s focus and the shifting of the love story to the B-plotline, what was an earlier rejected not-so-dream cast has once again been placed back on the table for consideration.

Actors Rejected Then Re-Selected

I feel for the actors that get rejected by a director during the audition process. Each has earned their right to win a role, but none of them can know how the perceived character traits might instantly be adjusted when a lead unexpectedly changes – Forcing the recasting of supporting characters.

PacinoIn Tried & True, Antonio Marcellus is an Italian mobster who hires our hero’s father to bring about his 24th exoneration. He is impeccably dressed with the latest fashion, loaded down with expensive jewelry and sports a jet-black ponytail. Al Pacino was our first choice based on whom we selected as our hero. Since our lead never got to contract, we shifted to a new lead, which forced a new mobster. We then looked at Mark Strong, but our lead changed again and we considered yet another actor.

In the meantime, we were simultaneously considering Gary Oldman, Kevin Costner and Mark Strong for the role of Alten Stafford, our hero’s father. These men are all excellent actors with managers that can protect them from this yoyo approach, which continues to change until all leads are signed. In our case, we have three leads that must first be perfectly balanced in screen strength for the story to work.

The shifting of schedules, changes in budget and higher offers that remove talent from the negotiation table create the yoyo effect – All because the director wants the best possible combination. Thankfully the rejected actors know that a change in fit caused the rejection, not their skill. Still, I feel for actors who fit and then don’t because the lead was changed, especially if they become a fit again once yet another lead signs.

Supporting Cast Supports, Not Outshines

The other element that can lead to a not-so-dream cast comes about when a supporting actor is hired that outshines the lead. While this sometimes sneaks up on a director due to an oversight in auditions, it becomes obvious to everyone once the film hits the silver screen.

A friend of mine was hired to play a lead in a drama. Her greatest performance was captured in a scene that would have been ideal for her next reel, but a supporting character overshadowed her. Had she included it in her reel, she would have lost all credibility as an actor. Unfortunately, the director focused so much on the supporting characters that the leads were undermined, the story wavered and the film flopped.

Its incidences like those that cause the rejected actors to be thankful they weren’t cast. Everyone loses when a supporting character outshines a lead and only the director has the control to make sure it doesn’t happen. This can also be the time when it becomes painfully obvious when a director has hired a friend or a relative to play a role they aren’t suited for.

I’ve come to the conclusion that no matter how much you want to work with a certain actor, the story should drive the talent selection process. And, those actors who are patient and great at what they do, will eventually find ideal roles from directors fulfilling their story requirements over their desires.

As for Tried & True, the latest script changes have forced us to relook at the leads, and therefore the entire cast. Some characters will probably survive the change like Detective Yeager who I’d like to fill with a specific theater character actor. Other roles will continue to change until the last lead actor is signed.

Copyright © 2014 by CJ Powers