Throwing a Story-Based Party

partyBack when my kids were little, my wife and I threw story-based parties for friends. The food and the decorations perfectly fit the period and we even invited our guests to come in costume based on the party’s storyline.

Our World War II party took place in what looked like a bunker. The Star Trek party appeared to be on another world with very colorful foods. And, our western party included a shootout with a cowboy stunt team – and yes, one guy was shot off of the roof.

This weekend my son is organizing a “room escape” party – the latest in entertainment events. Not only will it have a theme, but it will also be story-based. The goal of those “locked” in the room is to search and find clues, decipher the codes and follow them to the conclusion that reveals the key to get out.

All of the best parties that I’ve attended were story-based. Story events take a great deal of effort for the host to prepare, but everyone will remember the event for decades to come. I still bump into people who rave about my Christmas party from twenty-five years ago when Santa showed up with his real sleigh.

Here are the steps necessary to create a story-based party:

  1. Decide what story you want to tell. This is simply a way of determining the guest experience you want to create. The creation of a story or journey of sorts generates a form of movement within the party that keeps things alive and entertaining.
  2. Determine what the guests will do. By creating an plan, the guests will be physically and emotionally moved through a series of actions that generate surprise, awe and memorable ah-ha moments.
  3. Select where they will do it. The physical place or setting is always paramount to a good story. It sets the atmosphere and peaks the interest of all guests in attendance.
  4. Pick when the story will take place. The time period plays an important role in the setting. The period can be modern day, the future, or somewhere back in history. Creating designs that reflect the specific period you choose creates richness to the party that is not soon forgotten.
  5. Choose what the guests will say tomorrow. All story-based parties generate a buzz of conversation. Friends tell other friends all about their experience the day after the party. In fact, the better the party, the longer people talk about their experience. Therefore, determining the result or the emotional takeaway you’d like to instill in your guests is critical to the party’s follow up conversations.

After you’ve made a list of the above items, you can organize the event in an order that works best for the story. The flow of activities is essential for creating a seamless environment that engulfs your guests in a great experience.

By thinking through all aspects of the event and scripting out the throughline or the flow of the story, you can create a party worthy of a theme park. Then make a list of all the details that are significant to the storyline. I like to use a visual board that I can attach magazine clips, photos and note cards.

The next step is easy. Look through all the brainstorming work you’ve collected and pull it all together. I’ve always found that the visual collection of the ideas seems to always imply an obvious storyline that will flow naturally and be a great success.

I threw a Mother’s Day party that was a nostalgic look at the 1940’s during the summer. It included an award winning barbershop quartet, dancers recreating the charm of Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers, and a delightful meal common for the period. There was also a lot of beautiful lace table clothes and freshly cut flowers throughout the room.

Story-based parties are significantly more spectacular than store bought themes. They have a movement and richness that can’t be purchased in a box. It requires the host to be creative and think carefully about how to entertain each guest. It might even be the ultimate in hospitality because of the tremendous care taken on behalf of the guests.

Copyright © 2016 by CJ Powers

 

Awakened (Faith-Based Thriller) – Review

Screen Shot 2016-05-19 at 9.35.19 PM
I receive numerous films to critique, but I only take time to review the ones that have something unique to offer. So you can imagine my surprise to get a copy of a “faith-based thriller.” It was an oxymoron that I had to watch to satisfy my curiosity.

Faith-based films are slow, filled with preaching and mostly display low production value. Thrillers are mysterious, increase in intensity and speed of storytelling until the climax. The juxtaposition of the two made me curious, as I had to learn how the co-directors accomplished this feat.

The novelty of the concept peaked my interest when I learned the film won three festival awards and was awarded four Doves for family-friendly content. I had no idea how a thriller could be family-friendly, so I couldn’t wait to watch the film.

The faith-based elements of the film was certainly in place with a very slow pace that caused me to doze off three times. The preaching was intact with numerous quoted scriptures and a half dozen preaching moments. And, the production values were extremely poor.

The thriller side never ramped up its pace, nor did it compell me to watch the film until the last reveal. In fact, most of the thriller moments were more horror oriented and badly executed. I suppose I could say the film was horr-ible.

Co-directors Eugene Cuevas and Brian R. Reed shared the creation of several short films together, but this first feature length film of theirs was a bust. Hopefully they learned valuable insights into filmmaking from this disaster.

mediasI also hope that the three festivals that awarded the film for Best Visual Effects, Best Film and Best Feature Film have learned not to put their seal of approval on bad films. I can understand the desire to award the least worst film when a festival isn’t able to draw in great filmmakers, but the only way bad faith-based films and thrillers will ever improve is when only great films receive awards.

In case you’re wondering, the story is about a journalist who is captivated by a demon in the wake of losing his job. The demon appears in the form of a sexy 1960’s blues singer who convinces him to seek out the real story of her death. But thankfully, his spiritual wife realizes that sometimes the right hand has to help the left hand, so she does battle to save her husband.

The man feels like a “nobody” at the beginning of the film and demonstrates that he is a “nobody” at the end of the film. He doesn’t change or grow, so I’m not sure why the story was about him. She, on the other hand, is wise in the beginning and becomes more spiritual for her husband’s sake, by the end of the story.

For this film to receive four Doves for being family-friendly, someone had to have fallen asleep during its viewing and didn’t want anyone to know about it. With the poltergeist scenes of pictures flying off the wall and the bed sheet sitting up in the form of a dead woman, I’m not sure I’d view it as family-friendly. Not to mention the movement of the dead woman’s facial skin toward the end of the film.

My curiosity of how the co-directors merged faith-based and thriller genres has been quenched – They failed. Two diametrically opposed genres cannot be merged into anything worth watching. Rather than purchasing this DVD, take your family out to see The Jungle Book.

Copyright © 2016 by CJ Powers

University of Dissent Closes

Slide1When I was a teenager at the university, life became clear for the students around me. Each one was compelled to be a maverick in taking a new lifestyle back home. We invaded our communities with new concepts that disrupted the status quo. We shared our new radical ideas of respecting those who might be offended, while voicing our well thought out dissenting opinions.

Today’s university students have also become radicals in bringing new ideas to their communities. Their passionate lifestyle is about not offending anyone and punishing those who dissent or do not conform.

Yesterday morning, I read about a small church whose pastor worked a corporate job so the donations could pay the bills and go to the needy. He wrote blog entries to encourage his church attenders and shared biblical principles about love. Because his writings on love were not inclusive, a group of students felt he needed to be “punished.”

His corporation was bombarded with communications, each stating the importance of alignment with the LGBTQ community, so as to not offend anyone. Consequential threats accompanied each communiqué. The man was immediately fired to protect the company image.

The university students made it clear that any dissenting opinions would be punished. Unfortunately, they didn’t have a list of rules or allowances to follow, leaving everyone guessing if their next words would be safe or punishable.

The University I attended taught us how to think based on logic and laws. We were also taught how to consider abstract ideas and transform them into something real, tangible and measureable. In other words, we where taught how to give an opposing viewpoint with respect.

Today’s universities have closed the doors on dissenting opinions. All decisions are now filtered through the lens of not offending anyone. Hundreds of commencement speakers are cancelled each year once a search commit or a student finds that the speaker had a differing opinion twenty some years ago.

The best comedians of our day have been booed off university stages for using humor that makes fun of anything or anyone. The audiences are no longer able to discern any perspective except for the community based, politically correct viewpoint.

Public restrooms are now being called under the filter of the offense index. To make sure the LGBTQ community is not offended, pressure is being put on corporations and schools to allow people to choose the restroom they feel compelled to enter. Few dissenting opinions rise, as most people stay silent in order to keep their jobs.

Last weekend, a man suggested that to make sure 2% of the population is not offended, we offend 80% of the people who desire a safe haven while they take a bio break. Those not voicing a dissenting opinion, empower the 2% to come up with more things that will soon offend them. This will give them leverage to control and conform society to their ideals rather than to the ideals of the majority.

Historically, once a movement removes all the dissenters, only those in power take control, not the ones that put them in place – until the weak in society increase their numbers and regain their voice. The natural uprising historically turns the tables and brings the society back to reason and law, or it disperses the society in its collapse.

The only way to avoid this destruction is to give a good listen to all dissenting ideas, while only punishing those who break laws rather than arbitrary PC ideals. But, the universities no longer allow for free speech that promotes all opinions.

The days of speaking your mind and receiving respect are quickly evaporating. This is partially due to Millennials not understanding that respect only means acknowledgement, not the agreement of an idea. Until society once again realizes that acknowledgement and agreement is not the same thing, dissenting opinions will continue to be deemed guilty by those in power.

Copyright 2016 by CJ Powers