Paramount is hoping to capitalize on the type of controversy that drove The Passion of the Christ to a box office high by making sure word gets out about Muslims censoring the film in several Middle East countries. Censorship boards in Qatar, Bahrain and United Arab Emirates will not allow the film. Similar rejections have come from Egypt, Jordan and Kuwait.

According to the Hollywood Reporter, the leading Sunni Muslim institute Al-Azhar said any such movie is “contrary to faith.”

While Muslims have chosen to protect their families from seeing inaccurate content, the National Religious Broadcasters, an organization made up of Christian radio and television stations, merely asked Paramount to issue one of three statements within its advertising to clarify that Noah is not accurate:

“The film is inspired by the story of Noah.

While artistic license has been taken, we believe that this film is true to the essence, values, and integrity of a story that is a cornerstone of faith for millions of people worldwide.

The biblical story of Noah can be found in the book of Genesis.”

Paramount, in hopes that the statements would increase controversy and box office revenue, immediately complied.

It doesn’t take too much web surfing to realize controversy is starting to rise thanks to the extra boost Christians are giving the film. Some Christians are suggesting followers avoid it and remind readers that it will cause people to misinterpret and misquote scripture.

One blogger pointed out a few scripturally incorrect moments in Cecil B. DeMille’s The Ten Commandments and how Christians still today quote the film version over the Bible as truth. Others wrote a list of reasons why Christians needed to watch the inaccurate version of Noah for evangelistic reasons.

The winner of the various posts bantering about the film is Paramount who is expecting Noah to rise above the $300MM mark. Some have estimated that the Biblically inaccurate account would crash and burn within two weeks if it weren’t for Christians increasing the films attention and supporting it with their dollars.

As for the war against the accuracy of scripture, the Muslims are leading the charge and have taken a strong stance against the film. Not only do they want to protect families from the film’s inaccuracy, their laws also prohibits the depiction of prophets in order to avoid people believing the film over the scriptures, as demonstrated by The Ten Commandments.

So the question I propose is… “Will you see Noah, which releases on March 28th?”

Out of the hundreds of major motion pictures that release each year, few depict female conversations with other women. In society women tend to talk with other women often, but in feature films it’s hard to find. That is unless they are talking about men.

In 1985 the Bechdel Test was created to benchmark movies concerning the female gender. For a movie to pass, it must contain one scene in which two or more named female characters have a conversation about anything besides men. Two women tossing out one liners does not pass the test, as it must be a conversation with back and forth dialog.

Alison Bechdel created the test after reviewing over 2,500 films and realizing that none of them passed her simple test. Most high profile films all fail the test like The Social Network, the original Star Wars trilogy, The Lord of the Rings trilogy, Avatar and The Avengers to name a few.

This test was not created to point out films that are anti-women or to beef up the feminist movement, but just to bring awareness to the public about how gender is presented in film.

I quickly reviewed my Tried & True screenplay and was happy to find six scenes with a woman talking to another woman, but was shocked to find that all of the scenes except for one had the women talking about the male lead character or another man. And, the one scene that included a woman-to-woman conversation without any discussion about men was cut from the story to sharpen the focus on the male lead. My screenplay failed the Bechdel Test.

After reviewing many of my other screenplays, I was relieved to know that 80% of them passed the Bechdel Test, but wondered how those films will do at the box office compared to the 20% that failed the test. Hollywood has conducted surveys over several decades and learned that women will watch both a male and female lead, but men are prone to watch only male leads.

Therefore, to create a box office hit the lead must be male, which will further shift the story focus to develop the male character, most likely cutting or omitting those women-to-women scenes. The end result may be a stronger story about the man, but over all, it will be less realistic.

The question that comes to mind is whether or not our shorter attention spans would allow for expanded dialog, which could help facilitate a woman-to-woman conversation. My curiosity stems from men-to-men conversations being extremely short and men-to-women conversations being greatly truncated as well. It’s only the woman-to-woman conversation that explores greater depth of topic, a variety of perspectives and potential rabbit trails of extraneous information. None of which will be given screen time in an action or adventure film.

There is certainly no right or wrong about how much any given character needs to speak with other characters of the same gender, but the Bechdel Test does bring a fresh perspective to the screenplay editing process. After all, I’d like my dramas to be as close to reality as possible.

Copyright © 2014 by CJ Powers