Saul Bass Award Honors Drew Struzan

StruzanThe Hollywood Reporter’s Key Art Awards created the Saul Bass Award to honor graphic designers in the film industry who created their own iconic and influential style. The recipient of the award must have a body of work that stands out among the competition and inspires others in the film industry.

The creative design community considers Saul Bass as the most iconic and influential graphic designers in filmmaking. His 40-year career inspired several generations of artists, designers, students and directors. He worked for Hollywood’s greatest filmmakers including Alfred Hitchcock, Otto Preminger, Billy Wilder, Stanley Kubrick and Martin Scorsese.

Rambo: First BloodThis year’s winner of the Saul Bass Award was Drew Struzan. He painted more than 200 posters over the past four decades including Back to the Future, Star Wars, Rambo, Indiana Jones, and Pan’s Labyrinth. His style is uniquely his and brings a sense of the film’s narrative to life, while creating a reminiscent sense of going to the movies.

Struzan got his start in the 70’s painting record covers for recording artists from Roy Orbison to Liberace. In 1975 his Alice Cooper cover caught a film producer’s attention and he’s painted posters ever since.

Back to the FutureMy favorite poster of his was for Back to the Future. It captured the key elements of the film, while expressing the feelings the movie generated in its audience. The surprised look on Marty McFly’s (Michael J. Fox) face, the fire trails and the streaks of light beaming out as the DeLorean fades into the past.

“My job,” says Struzan, “is to capture the spirit of the movie – How it feels. People will see it because they want to feel that emotion. It becomes iconic when they can have that feeling every time they look at the poster.”

Episode1Struzan has an eye for the nuances that a camera seldom catches. Whether it’s a pensive look or one of a startled character, Struzan worked to seize the feelings of the moment. His unique style drove a new generation of collectors to expand the practice of collecting movie posters to an all time high. This fueled the collection of original movie poster art by top collectors and museums worldwide.

It’s no wonder that The Hollywood Reporter’s Key Art Awards honored Drew Strazon for his life long work in 2014.

Copyright © 2014 by CJ Powers

Hollywood Fights Disclosure Laws to Learn Who You Are

© IvicaNS - Fotolia.comThere are two arguments in the world of media that concern audiences. First, is Hollywood wanting to know who you are and what you watch, so they can contour programming to fit your likes for the sake of building a stronger catalyst for their advertisers. Second, are filmmakers that make strong programs that attract new anonymous audiences as a repercussion of the show’s cultural influences.

One sets you up to influence your buying decisions of specific brands and the other impacts your cultural decisions to purchase more things and experiences over all. Either way you address the subject, it’s all about Hollywood training us to worship the economy above all else.

NETFLIX uses algorithms to determine a person’s viewing taste and then promotes similar films to that viewer. By turning on NETFLIX at a friend’s house, a person can see an entire promotion list of different shows than what he or she would see at home, unless the friend has very similar tastes.

This methodology is not limited to a single company. For years the cable industry has collected data on audience viewing habits, but by law was not able to share the information with the networks. However, now that cable providers also own programming to compete against Internet offerings, the networks are stuck behind laws that hinder their knowledge of who’s watching, while the competition already knows who you are and what you watch.

One of the reason’s advertisers shifted to support cable programs comes from the knowledge of what you watch. They wanted to save ad dollars by placing their spots only on the shows their target audience views. Not only would their budgets have a higher conversion rate in generating sales dollars, but they would also be able to conform their universal commercials into taste specific ones.

The resulting battle for this information puts the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988 in peril, as companies fight to know “personally identifiable information” about you. This becomes even more important as companies like HBO, CBS, and ESPN all release new subscription services this fall to compete against NETFLIX.

Current court battles based on alleged disclosures of what you watch includes Hulu, Cartoon Network, Disney Interactive and AMC Networks. While some of the allegations include combining information with Facebook, others are more straightforward in pin pointing ad tastes.

Yes, big brother is alive and well in Hollywood and many companies know your viewing habits, cell phone IDs, and video device IP addresses. They have enough information to push key programming your way in a slow progressive manner to alter your cultural choices. But, what they want next is to sell this information about you for capital gains.

Can you imagine a new political arena where you are slowly fed certain programming over four years to change your conservative voting pattern into a liberal one? Or, what about training you over eight years to change your desires about where you live or the car you drive? These tools have been in place since the 90’s.

It wasn’t coincidence that had a half dozen shows promoting a black president and a woman president for a few years before the 2008 elections. In fact, if you look at a map of viewing choices per top television markets and overlap it with presidential results, you’d see an obvious correlation.

There is no longer a conversation about whether or not the media impacts society, it does. The court allegations of today is whether or not your personal information can be sold to other companies so they can present their messages to influence your decisions in the near future.

What are your thoughts?

Should your personal information be sold so you’ll only receive ads designed just for you instead of being heaped on by thousands of ads that you don’t care about?

Or, should the companies that provide your purchased services hold your private information?

Copyright © 2014 by CJ Powers

4 Reasons for Big Box Retail Entertainment

I saw first hand last night that entertainment is still the number one choice for corporations to inspire and encourage its workers. The large store was packed with a couple hundred people wearing team t-shirts, super hero capes and villain costumes. The gathering was to support their cashier clerks’ competition in a district level Olympics.

The festivities kicked off with a parade of stores marching in themed costumes and making enough noise to not only be noticed, but to display their store enthusiasm. While some wore elaborate costumes, others had just enough of a design to hint at their favorite character, and still others donned simple themed t-shirts.

The Olympic competition saw cashier clerks from several stores match wits, skill and speed at the registers. Some demonstrated an awesome prowess that comes from significant repetitive experience and others displayed skills that revealed their secret ability in spotting shoplifters.

To entertain the crowd that wasn’t able to fit around the competition registers, a live DJ spun the latest music and energized the dance floor with people of all ages. Several showcased their clubbing experience with style. A few people like me, who held our own, quickly picked up on the latest line dance with a touch of flare – At least in my mind.

CAPlenty of food followed from the long buffet that managed to feed hundreds within 15-20 minutes. Then came the medal announcements and the team spirit award, which raised such a loud ruckus that I had to plug my ears numerous times.

My invitation was from the store that won the silver and I was encouraged to attend the soon to follow regional competition. I was also warned to bring earplugs, as the din of the crowd will well exceed the ear piercing decibels displayed last night.

After the explosive night of fun filled entertainment, I sat back in my couch with a cup of cinnamon tea and thought through what I had experienced. I realized that there were four key reasons the stores threw an elaborate night of entertainment.

  1. Lifts Spirits – While there’s a curmudgeon in every crowd, it was difficult to find them in a sea of smiles, laughter and spirited shouting. Most everyone left in a far better mood than the workday had inspired.
  2. Team Bonding – The camaraderie between teammates became obvious. People who struggled to work side-by-side with coworkers found a new way to come together on behalf of their team. This bonding experience in of itself will lead to more customer satisfaction as workers team together toward common goals during work hours.
  3. Inspires Self-Expression – Donning costumes of one’s own design not only displays the person’s tastes, but also reveals their dedication and style, while hinting at their private lives. The amount of effort and detail placed in a costume speaks volumes about the person’s attitude and their position among peers.
  4. Displays Skills – The competition establishes bragging rights and raises the bar on development and training. Those who medal in the event also glean new levels of respect.

The experience was well worth my time and I even took home a souvenir team t-shirt. While I’m not yet sure if I’ll risk the noise levels next week, I couldn’t help but wonder how the entertainment levels might step up at the regional competition – One of last year’s events saw motorcycles racing through store aisles and horses trotting around floor displays.

What types of entertainment are used to inspire workers at your place of employment?