Young Directors Focus on 3 Things

Dolly move during scene 1I had a recent conversation with a young director who was about to shoot her first film. She was eager to make sure she wasn’t missing anything in prep and asked me to explain what a director does in prep, production and post.

The first twenty items rattled out of my mouth with ease and her face drained of color. She was overwhelmed and wasn’t ready to hear the remaining 80 – 90 items. She said, “To do all that, you’d have to be a businessman, psychologist, coach, artist, life-experienced decision maker … a lot of things.”

“Yes, and then some,” I said.

She understood. She also realized why there are few good directors that actually do the work of a director.

“Now I understand why there’s so many bad shows,” she said. Her head tilted in thought and within moments she regrouped. Her eyes lost that hazy fog and she brought clarity with one question. “As an inexperienced rookie who might not be able to handle the full job, what three things must I do to succeed?”

Here are my three responses:

  1. Read the script from top to bottom and notate your emotional experience.

The first read through is the most important, as the director can never have a second, first read. During the reading, the writer’s work will point out the key elements that will make the story succeed. If the director notates it and determines how to shoot it in a way that the audience can experience the same emotional line, the film has a chance at being great.

However, if the director doesn’t capture the emotional pulse of the story, none of the scenes will play out properly during the shoot. Since the director is the only one who will be able to spot the straying storyline during the shoot, he must capture and understand the emotional pulse of the story. Without it reduced to writing in his director’s notebook, he will be directing with a proverbial blindfold on.

  1. Pencil out a blocking diagram.

Independent productions cost about $5,000 – $25,000 per hour (I’m not talking about ultra low budget films). Rehearsals during prep week cost a fraction of that budget. Therefore its mandatory that a director comes to set prepared to share blocking instructions with the cast and DP (Director of Photography). A quick rehearsal will work out the kinks and the shoot can begin.

Many young directors think they are more creative by designing the blocking on the fly during an extended rehearsal prior to rolling the cameras. These moments become very costly and rarely integrate with the previous or subsequent scenes. Only the director has a full understanding of how the picture will come together before editing, so if he doesn’t do his homework, then no one knows in advance how the picture will look.

  1. Create a shot list.

Most single camera shoots today require 2-4 cameras to keep within budget. During a typical conversation between two characters, each actor has a close-up camera and an over-the-shoulder camera. This gives the director full latitude in making decisions during post. However, it can become sloppy and extend the editor’s cutting time three fold. To counter this delay, it’s important for the director to create a shot list for the DP, which will be reflected in the editor’s log.

Single camera shoots that only use one camera also require a shot list to make sure set-ups aren’t revisited. The shot list also pinpoints the most important shots in case the day runs long and shots have to be dropped. The list is the only way to guarantee that all the important shots are captured.

These three activities will assure that a new director has a fighting chance to survive. Without any one of them, the film will surely be a disaster in quality, budget or schedule. Not to mention the whole reason for creating the story will have evaporated from the set for lack of prepared vision.

© 2016 by CJ Powers

 

The 3 A’s of Story Movement

When I was a child, my dad told me that a motion picture was about movement. I said, “dah!” But later I realized he was profoundly right. I’ve seen too many films that were not about movement. I’m not talking about the physical motion you see on screen where either the camera is moving or the actor moves, although that is present in film.

I’m speaking about story movement.

Every great story has the triple A’s of story movement: Anticipation, Action, and Aftermath. It is no different than the beginning, middle and end, except for one small factor: It’s about building a question in the mind of a viewer that must be quenched by watching more of the show.

ANTICIPATION

The “what” of a story is typically known by the audience before watching the film. The key is to make sure the audience doesn’t presume the “how” of the story before it unfolds. However, to create story movement the director must build anticipation in the audience to see if things play out in the expected way. While the ending might turn out close to expectations, how the story unfolds must be new and unique.

Blog_AAA-1My picture of a character reaching for a flower is symbolic of anticipation. It causes the audience to wonder if the character will caress the flower and smell it, or pick it. Both possibilities have been seen before, so how it’s done tells a new story worth watching. Not knowing how things will play out causes the audience to anticipate several possibilities. The audience is compelled to continue watching to see the outcome.

ACTION

Blog_AAA-2The flower being picked confirms the anticipated event to be new or what was expected, but done in a fresh way. It also raises another question. The audience now wants to know what will happen to the flower. The action drives the viewer to seek the end of the scene. They need to know if the character will hand the flower to someone, put it in a vase, toss it over the neighbors fence, or maybe realize that picking it killed the poor thing and grieve. The possibilities are endless.

AFTERMATH

Blog_AAA-3The aftermath isn’t always negative, but many times it is, except for the midpoint and climax of the film. But it’s always emotional so the audience shares the experience and desires to know more about what will happen in the next scene. Many writers speak about this moment being critical to moving a story forward using a consequence or conflict.

Every scene must have the three A’s to drive the audience’s desire for more story. Without it, the film falls apart. The magic of the three A’s is that it works every time, keeping the story moving and raises questions in the audience’s mind about what comes next. Great stories compel the audience to watch every subsequent scene until the film’s resolving climax and epilog.

© 2016 by CJ Powers

Minorities Cry for Hollywood Boycott at Academy Awards®

Academy AwardsHollywood PR firms trying to promote the Academy Awards gained little traction with news stories. The goal was to create controversy about the “lack” of minorities in movies to get the publics’ attention and viewership for The Oscars®. Additional promotions suggested that host Chris Rock would stick it to the system during the show’s opening. However, few people jumped on the bandwagon when it comes to social media.

The lack of attention might be due to the fact that Hollywood employs a lot of minorities. The employment happens to be within 10% of the actual population demographics. The only outlier in the attempted controversy was from the LGBT community that demanded that 20% of people hired should be LGBT, while about 2% of the population is actually LGBT.

This push by LGBT was most likely made as an attempt to take advantage of surveys that show the majority of Americans think LGBT makes up 22% of the population due to its power over the media. However, liberal universities have conducted surveys that show the number to be as high as 3.8%, while conservative universities have survey results at 0.6%. The latest governmental released data has LGBT at 1.8% of the population.

The numbers aren’t the only factor. The actors all agree that they vote based on performance not skin color. Many of the minorities who have already won Oscars® say that theirs was earned from their peers and it wasn’t a political gift. Other actors confirm that sentiment and are concerned that changing the landscape to increase the number of minorities being nominated will shift the award from representing the best to balancing races by awarding lessor performances.

Will Smith was one actor who didn’t win an Oscar®, but he wasn’t able to complain because he lost to Denzel Washington. Smith is enjoyed by many fans, but most would say that no matter how much they appreciate his work, Washington truly delivers award-winning performances in the majority of his films.

Unfortunately, the President of the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences, a black woman, saw fit to use the controversy to change the rules. Within a week of the story hitting, the Academy with over 6,000 members stopped all of the older experts in the craft from voting. These are people that made the craft what it is today and they are no longer “qualified” to say which performances were the best.

At the same time, the Academy invited hundreds of minorities with little film experience to join. This move watered down the number of voters who understand what makes for great performances and increased the number of ignorant newbies with voting privileges. One person estimated that there is now about a 30% greater chance that bad performers will be nominated next year.

In the past, people were invited into the academy once they had mastered their craft to the point of notoriety. Now, individuals who haven’t yet mastered their craft are members because of their skin color. The voting landscape is now about politics, popularity and leverage. I’d prefer to learn who the masters think have earned the right to be called the best.

© 2016 by CJ Powers