How to Become a G.R.E.A.T. Screenwriter

© Pixelbliss - Fotolia.comOver the past few years I’ve spoken with a couple dozen screenwriters including three Oscar® winners. In each conversation I’ve asked how I should best spend my 10,000 hours in becoming a great screenwriter. For those of you not familiar with Outliers, author Malcolm Gladwell repeatedly mentions the “10,000-Hour Rule”, claiming that it took experts in any given field 10,000 hours of task specific practice to master their craft.

In this article, I’ve summarized the various answers that I’ve received and created the G.R.E.A.T. acronym to share how to set 21-40 hours a week aside to become a great screenwriter.

G.  GO TO THE MOVIES every week (2-4 hours/week). Screenwriters go to a minimum of one movie every week on average. Additional movies can be watched on NETFLIX or from a personal DVD/Blu-Ray library (which all screenwriters own), but it’s critically important for screenwriters to attend films in theatres every week. This brings an advantage of understanding their audience and how they react to various types of scenes in a movie.

R.  READ A SCREENPLAY every week (2-3 hours/week). Studios make their best screenplays available every year for Oscar® nomination consideration. Screenwriters download the 20-30 screenplays and read each one to learn about their competition and to glean any useful information to improve his or her skills. Screenplays can also be found online and purchased from writer stores.

E.  EXERCISE WRITING SKILLS every day (14-28 hours/week). Authors write and screenwriters do the same every day. Yes, every day. Screenwriters experience what some refer to as a form of withdrawal when they don’t write. The creative side of the brain is very aware of its lack on the days that the writer doesn’t reduce some thoughts to writing. All professionals stay up on their writing to stay polished and creative.

A.  ASSOCIATE WITH SCREENWRITERS every month (1 hour/week). While networking is critical in the entertainment business, staying connected to associate screenwriters is also important. The creative soul is helped by the sharing of tips and tricks, along with the sharing of related circumstances that only writers understand. These comradery sessions encourage us to better ourselves regularly so we have something worth sharing.

T.  TAKE NOTES every day (2-4 hours/week). Screenwriters find great moments in every day life that are worth capturing for their “future” folder. During the research phase of a given story everything is captured in multiple forms for later. This might include roughing out a quick draft of a given scene, collecting clips from another source that can be adapted, or research notes captured on a napkin or scratch pad when submerged in the library or surfing the net. Those who try to stash the information in their memory typically lose those great moments.

The G.R.E.A.T. Screenwriter is a person who does all of the above without giving it consideration, as it is a part of who he or she is. The process is fulfilling for the screenwriter and makes total sense. However, the person who wants to be a screenwriter, but doesn’t have it in their veins will find the above list painful to execute.

For instance, a screenwriter will not only watch the films they love and the types of films they desire to write, but will also watch films they would never normally watch to better understand the genre, style, and narrative structure. On the other hand, the non-writer who wants to craft a screenplay will avoid films they don’t like and that don’t match the type of story they want to write.

While studying Scorsese’s film, The Wolf of Wall Street, I learned that the screenwriter used the F-word 506 times. Due to the rule of diminishing returns, the word was weakened to a meaningless quip. By understanding the lack of impact that film made on me, I was able to rewrite an action film without any language. By the end of the story when the main character screams out, “No!”, it actually makes a far greater impact than the F-word did in Scorsese’s film.

Copyright © 2014 by CJ Powers

Female Dialog Slighted in Movies

Female Dialog Slighted in MoviesOut of the hundreds of major motion pictures that release each year, few depict female conversations with other women. In society women tend to talk with other women often, but in feature films it’s hard to find. That is unless they are talking about men.

In 1985 the Bechdel Test was created to benchmark movies concerning the female gender. For a movie to pass, it must contain one scene in which two or more named female characters have a conversation about anything besides men. Two women tossing out one liners does not pass the test, as it must be a conversation with back and forth dialog.

Alison Bechdel created the test after reviewing over 2,500 films and realizing that none of them passed her simple test. Most high profile films all fail the test like The Social Network, the original Star Wars trilogy, The Lord of the Rings trilogy, Avatar and The Avengers to name a few.

This test was not created to point out films that are anti-women or to beef up the feminist movement, but just to bring awareness to the public about how gender is presented in film.

I quickly reviewed my Tried & True screenplay and was happy to find six scenes with a woman talking to another woman, but was shocked to find that all of the scenes except for one had the women talking about the male lead character or another man. And, the one scene that included a woman-to-woman conversation without any discussion about men was cut from the story to sharpen the focus on the male lead. My screenplay failed the Bechdel Test.

After reviewing many of my other screenplays, I was relieved to know that 80% of them passed the Bechdel Test, but wondered how those films will do at the box office compared to the 20% that failed the test. Hollywood has conducted surveys over several decades and learned that women will watch both a male and female lead, but men are prone to watch only male leads.

Therefore, to create a box office hit the lead must be male, which will further shift the story focus to develop the male character, most likely cutting or omitting those women-to-women scenes. The end result may be a stronger story about the man, but over all, it will be less realistic.

The question that comes to mind is whether or not our shorter attention spans would allow for expanded dialog, which could help facilitate a woman-to-woman conversation. My curiosity stems from men-to-men conversations being extremely short and men-to-women conversations being greatly truncated as well. It’s only the woman-to-woman conversation that explores greater depth of topic, a variety of perspectives and potential rabbit trails of extraneous information. None of which will be given screen time in an action or adventure film.

There is certainly no right or wrong about how much any given character needs to speak with other characters of the same gender, but the Bechdel Test does bring a fresh perspective to the screenplay editing process. After all, I’d like my dramas to be as close to reality as possible.

Copyright © 2014 by CJ Powers